# MTranServer vs OmniVoice-Studio

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MTranServer | OmniVoice-Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 62/100 | 94/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 9 in Translation | #1 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 4 730 | 92 336 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +11 | +57 395 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 35 ✓ |
| Latest release | v5.1.0 · 16 Oct 2026 | v0.5.7 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C++ | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

OmniVoice-Studio scores 94/100 against 62/100 for MTranServer, so it is the safer default.

OmniVoice-Studio ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for MTranServer.

If you want the quickest setup, MTranServer is easier to run; OmniVoice-Studio needs more configuration.

OmniVoice-Studio is growing faster right now (+57 395 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [MTranServer](https://selfhost.directory/project/mtranserver) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mtranserver.md)
- [OmniVoice-Studio](https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mtranserver-vs-omnivoice-studio