MQTTX WebvsZabbix
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MQTTX Web | Zabbix | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 10 in IoT | #13 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 5 086 | 6 518 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +22 | +107 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.13.2 · 26 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go Template |
Which one should you pick?
Zabbix scores 75/100 against 67/100 for MQTTX Web, so it is the safer default.
MQTTX Web ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zabbix.
If you want the quickest setup, MQTTX Web is easier to run; Zabbix needs more configuration.
Zabbix is growing faster right now (+107 stars in 30 days).
MQTTX Web details →Zabbix details →
Swap a project
Keep MQTTX Web, compare it with
Keep Zabbix, compare it with