# MQTTX Web vs VDO.Ninja

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MQTTX Web | VDO.Ninja |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 67/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 10 in IoT | #3 of 36 in Video Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 5 086 ✓ | 4 116 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +22 | +58 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 3 |
| Latest release | v1.13.2 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | v30.2 · 12 May 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

MQTTX Web and VDO.Ninja score the same (67/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.

If you want the quickest setup, MQTTX Web is easier to run; VDO.Ninja needs more configuration.

VDO.Ninja is growing faster right now (+58 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [MQTTX Web](https://selfhost.directory/project/mqttx-web) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mqttx-web.md)
- [VDO.Ninja](https://selfhost.directory/project/vdoninja) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/vdoninja.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mqttx-web-vs-vdoninja