MQTTX WebvsUpptime
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MQTTX Web | Upptime | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 10 in IoT | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 5 086 | 17 183 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +22 | +-1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.13.2 · 26 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Markdown |
Which one should you pick?
Upptime scores 69/100 against 67/100 for MQTTX Web, so it is the safer default.
MQTTX Web ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Upptime.
MQTTX Web is growing faster right now (+22 stars in 30 days).
MQTTX Web details →Upptime details →
Swap a project
Keep MQTTX Web, compare it with
Keep Upptime, compare it with