MQTTX WebvsUnison
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MQTTX Web | Unison | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 65/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 10 in IoT | #2 of 15 in File Sync |
| GitHub stars | 5 086 | 5 559 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +21 | +65 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 2 |
| Latest release | v1.13.2 · 26 Oct 2026 | v2.54.0 · 1 May 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | OCaml |
Which one should you pick?
MQTTX Web scores 67/100 against 65/100 for Unison, so it is the safer default.
MQTTX Web ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Unison.
If you want the quickest setup, MQTTX Web is easier to run; Unison needs more configuration.
Unison is growing faster right now (+65 stars in 30 days).
MQTTX Web details →Unison details →
Swap a project
Keep MQTTX Web, compare it with
Keep Unison, compare it with