MQTTX WebvsUmbraco CMS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MQTTX Web | Umbraco CMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 10 in IoT | #7 of 42 in Content Management |
| GitHub stars | 5 086 | 5 277 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +22 | +22 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 27 |
| Latest release | v1.13.2 · 26 Oct 2026 | release-13.16.4 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | C |
Which one should you pick?
Umbraco CMS scores 71/100 against 67/100 for MQTTX Web, so it is the safer default.
Umbraco CMS ships more often: 27 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for MQTTX Web.
If you want the quickest setup, MQTTX Web is easier to run; Umbraco CMS needs more configuration.
MQTTX Web details →Umbraco CMS details →
Swap a project
Keep MQTTX Web, compare it with
Keep Umbraco CMS, compare it with