# MQTTX Web vs tapflow

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MQTTX Web | tapflow |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 ✓ | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 10 in IoT | #4 of 10 in Testing |
| GitHub stars | 5 086 ✓ | 1 358 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +22 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.13.2 · 26 Oct 2026 | v0.30.0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

MQTTX Web scores 67/100 against 55/100 for tapflow, so it is the safer default.

tapflow ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for MQTTX Web.

If you want the quickest setup, MQTTX Web is easier to run; tapflow needs more configuration.

MQTTX Web is growing faster right now (+22 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [MQTTX Web](https://selfhost.directory/project/mqttx-web) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mqttx-web.md)
- [tapflow](https://selfhost.directory/project/tapflow) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tapflow.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mqttx-web-vs-tapflow