# MQTTX Web vs sentry

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MQTTX Web | sentry |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 80/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 10 in IoT | #1 of 9 in Application Performance Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 5 086 | 45 666 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +22 | +834 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 21 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.13.2 · 26 Oct 2026 | search-syntax@1.0.0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

sentry scores 80/100 against 67/100 for MQTTX Web, so it is the safer default.

sentry ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for MQTTX Web.

If you want the quickest setup, MQTTX Web is easier to run; sentry needs more configuration.

sentry is growing faster right now (+834 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [MQTTX Web](https://selfhost.directory/project/mqttx-web) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mqttx-web.md)
- [sentry](https://selfhost.directory/project/sentry) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sentry.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mqttx-web-vs-sentry