MQTTX Webvssentry
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MQTTX Web | sentry | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 80/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 10 in IoT | #1 of 9 in Application Performance Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 5 086 | 45 666 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +22 | +834 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 21 |
| Latest release | v1.13.2 · 26 Oct 2026 | search-syntax@1.0.0 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
sentry scores 80/100 against 67/100 for MQTTX Web, so it is the safer default.
sentry ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for MQTTX Web.
If you want the quickest setup, MQTTX Web is easier to run; sentry needs more configuration.
sentry is growing faster right now (+834 stars in 30 days).
MQTTX Web details →sentry details →
Swap a project
Keep MQTTX Web, compare it with
Keep sentry, compare it with