# MQTTX Web vs SearXNG

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MQTTX Web | SearXNG |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 10 in IoT | #1 of 41 in Search Engines |
| GitHub stars | 5 086 | 38 946 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +22 | +1 380 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.13.2 · 26 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

SearXNG scores 86/100 against 67/100 for MQTTX Web, so it is the safer default.

MQTTX Web ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for SearXNG.

If you want the quickest setup, MQTTX Web is easier to run; SearXNG needs more configuration.

SearXNG is growing faster right now (+1 380 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [MQTTX Web](https://selfhost.directory/project/mqttx-web) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mqttx-web.md)
- [SearXNG](https://selfhost.directory/project/searxng) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/searxng.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mqttx-web-vs-searxng