MQTTX Webvssdnext
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MQTTX Web | sdnext | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 10 in IoT | #3 of 11 in Image Generation |
| GitHub stars | 5 086 | 7 362 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +21 | +16 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.13.2 · 26 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
sdnext scores 71/100 against 67/100 for MQTTX Web, so it is the safer default.
MQTTX Web ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for sdnext.
If you want the quickest setup, MQTTX Web is easier to run; sdnext needs more configuration.
MQTTX Web details →sdnext details →
Swap a project
Keep MQTTX Web, compare it with
Keep sdnext, compare it with