# MQTTX Web vs ryot

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MQTTX Web | ryot |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 ✓ | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 10 in IoT | #4 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 5 087 ✓ | 3 648 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +22 | +42 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | v1.13.2 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | v10.5.0 · 22 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

MQTTX Web scores 67/100 against 63/100 for ryot, so it is the safer default.

MQTTX Web ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for ryot.

If you want the quickest setup, MQTTX Web is easier to run; ryot needs more configuration.

## Details

- [MQTTX Web](https://selfhost.directory/project/mqttx-web) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mqttx-web.md)
- [ryot](https://selfhost.directory/project/ryot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ryot.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mqttx-web-vs-ryot