# MQTTX Web vs PaddleOCR

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MQTTX Web | PaddleOCR |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 85/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 10 in IoT | #1 of 4 in OCR |
| GitHub stars | 5 086 | 91 855 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +22 | +414 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 8 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.13.2 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | v3.7.0 · 11 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

PaddleOCR scores 85/100 against 67/100 for MQTTX Web, so it is the safer default.

PaddleOCR ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for MQTTX Web.

If you want the quickest setup, MQTTX Web is easier to run; PaddleOCR needs more configuration.

PaddleOCR is growing faster right now (+414 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [MQTTX Web](https://selfhost.directory/project/mqttx-web) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mqttx-web.md)
- [PaddleOCR](https://selfhost.directory/project/paddleocr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/paddleocr.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mqttx-web-vs-paddleocr