# MQTTX Web vs OmniRoute

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MQTTX Web | OmniRoute |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 88/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 10 in IoT | #4 of 125 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 5 086 | 82 065 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +22 | +3 049 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.13.2 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | radar-export-latest · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

OmniRoute scores 88/100 against 67/100 for MQTTX Web, so it is the safer default.

OmniRoute ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for MQTTX Web.

OmniRoute is growing faster right now (+3 049 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [MQTTX Web](https://selfhost.directory/project/mqttx-web) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mqttx-web.md)
- [OmniRoute](https://selfhost.directory/project/omniroute) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/omniroute.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mqttx-web-vs-omniroute