# mqttui vs sentry

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | mqttui | sentry |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 80/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #8 of 10 in IoT | #1 of 9 in Application Performance Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 225 | 45 679 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +840 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 22 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.0.2 · 25 Mar 2026 | 26.10.1 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

sentry scores 80/100 against 48/100 for mqttui, so it is the safer default.

sentry ships more often: 22 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for mqttui.

If you want the quickest setup, mqttui is easier to run; sentry needs more configuration.

sentry is growing faster right now (+840 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [mqttui](https://selfhost.directory/project/mqttui) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mqttui.md)
- [sentry](https://selfhost.directory/project/sentry) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sentry.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mqttui-vs-sentry