# mqttui vs sdnext

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | mqttui | sdnext |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 71/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #8 of 10 in IoT | #3 of 11 in Image Generation |
| GitHub stars | 225 | 7 362 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +16 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v2.0.2 · 25 Mar 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

sdnext scores 71/100 against 48/100 for mqttui, so it is the safer default.

mqttui ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for sdnext.

sdnext is growing faster right now (+16 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [mqttui](https://selfhost.directory/project/mqttui) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mqttui.md)
- [sdnext](https://selfhost.directory/project/sdnext) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sdnext.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mqttui-vs-sdnext