# mqttui vs Pi-hole

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | mqttui | Pi-hole |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #8 of 10 in IoT | #1 of 41 in DNS |
| GitHub stars | 224 | 61 542 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +498 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 6 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.0.2 · 25 Mar 2026 | v6.5 · 17 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Python | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

Pi-hole scores 87/100 against 48/100 for mqttui, so it is the safer default.

Pi-hole ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for mqttui.

Pi-hole is growing faster right now (+498 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [mqttui](https://selfhost.directory/project/mqttui) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mqttui.md)
- [Pi-hole](https://selfhost.directory/project/pi-hole) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pi-hole.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mqttui-vs-pi-hole