# mqttui vs Navidrome Music Server

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | mqttui | Navidrome Music Server |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 80/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #8 of 10 in IoT | #2 of 54 in Media Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 224 | 24 414 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +656 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 15 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.0.2 · 25 Mar 2026 | v0.64.2 · 23 Sept 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Navidrome Music Server scores 80/100 against 48/100 for mqttui, so it is the safer default.

Navidrome Music Server ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for mqttui.

If you want the quickest setup, Navidrome Music Server is easier to run; mqttui needs more configuration.

Navidrome Music Server is growing faster right now (+656 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [mqttui](https://selfhost.directory/project/mqttui) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mqttui.md)
- [Navidrome Music Server](https://selfhost.directory/project/navidrome-music-server) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/navidrome-music-server.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mqttui-vs-navidrome-music-server