mqtt-exportervsSearXNG
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| mqtt-exporter | SearXNG | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #67 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #1 of 41 in Search Engines |
| GitHub stars | 168 | 38 961 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +1 395 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 0 |
| Latest release | mqtt-exporter-0.1.4 · 11 May 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
SearXNG scores 86/100 against 48/100 for mqtt-exporter, so it is the safer default.
mqtt-exporter ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for SearXNG.
If you want the quickest setup, mqtt-exporter is easier to run; SearXNG needs more configuration.
SearXNG is growing faster right now (+1 395 stars in 30 days).
mqtt-exporter details →SearXNG details →
Swap a project
Keep mqtt-exporter, compare it with
Keep SearXNG, compare it with