# mousehole vs OmniVoice-Studio

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | mousehole | OmniVoice-Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 44/100 | 94/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #64 of 86 in File Sharing | #1 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 318 | 93 418 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +58 144 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 | 35 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.5.0 · 20 Jun 2026 | v0.5.7 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | — | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

OmniVoice-Studio scores 94/100 against 44/100 for mousehole, so it is the safer default.

OmniVoice-Studio ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for mousehole.

OmniVoice-Studio is growing faster right now (+58 144 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [mousehole](https://selfhost.directory/project/mousehole) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mousehole.md)
- [OmniVoice-Studio](https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mousehole-vs-omnivoice-studio