# motionEye vs Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | motionEye | Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 ✓ | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 24 in Video Surveillance | #4 of 11 in Container Orchestration |
| GitHub stars | 4 720 ✓ | 1 725 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +36 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 9 ✓ |
| Latest release | 0.44.0 · 21 Jun 2026 | 4.4.4 · 20 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

motionEye scores 65/100 against 64/100 for Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes, so it is the safer default.

Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for motionEye.

If you want the quickest setup, motionEye is easier to run; Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes needs more configuration.

motionEye is growing faster right now (+36 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [motionEye](https://selfhost.directory/project/motioneye) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/motioneye.md)
- [Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes](https://selfhost.directory/project/zero-to-jupyterhub-k8s) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zero-to-jupyterhub-k8s.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/motioneye-vs-zero-to-jupyterhub-k8s