# motionEye vs Zero-K

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | motionEye | Zero-K |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 ✓ | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 24 in Video Surveillance | #2 of 23 in Gaming |
| GitHub stars | 4 720 ✓ | 877 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +35 ✓ | +26 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | 0.44.0 · 21 Jun 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Lua |

## Which one should you pick?

motionEye scores 65/100 against 62/100 for Zero-K, so it is the safer default.

motionEye ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zero-K.

## Details

- [motionEye](https://selfhost.directory/project/motioneye) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/motioneye.md)
- [Zero-K](https://selfhost.directory/project/zero-k) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zero-k.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/motioneye-vs-zero-k