# motionEye vs Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP)

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | motionEye | Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 80/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 24 in Video Surveillance | #4 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 4 720 | 16 058 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +36 | +243 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 31 ✓ |
| Latest release | 0.44.0 · 21 Jun 2026 | w2026-10-23 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) scores 80/100 against 65/100 for motionEye, so it is the safer default.

Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) ships more often: 31 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for motionEye.

Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) is growing faster right now (+243 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [motionEye](https://selfhost.directory/project/motioneye) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/motioneye.md)
- [Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP)](https://selfhost.directory/project/zed-attack-proxy-zap) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zed-attack-proxy-zap.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/motioneye-vs-zed-attack-proxy-zap