# motionEye vs Zammad

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | motionEye | Zammad |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 70/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 24 in Video Surveillance | #1 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 4 721 | 6 050 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +36 | +98 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | 0.44.0 · 21 Jun 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Ruby |

## Which one should you pick?

Zammad scores 70/100 against 65/100 for motionEye, so it is the safer default.

motionEye ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zammad.

If you want the quickest setup, motionEye is easier to run; Zammad needs more configuration.

Zammad is growing faster right now (+98 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [motionEye](https://selfhost.directory/project/motioneye) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/motioneye.md)
- [Zammad](https://selfhost.directory/project/zammad) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zammad.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/motioneye-vs-zammad