motionEyevsZammad
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| motionEye | Zammad | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 24 in Video Surveillance | #1 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 4 721 | 6 050 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +36 | +98 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 0 |
| Latest release | 0.44.0 · 21 Jun 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
Zammad scores 70/100 against 65/100 for motionEye, so it is the safer default.
motionEye ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zammad.
If you want the quickest setup, motionEye is easier to run; Zammad needs more configuration.
Zammad is growing faster right now (+98 stars in 30 days).
motionEye details →Zammad details →