# motionEye vs Yarr

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | motionEye | Yarr |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 ✓ | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 24 in Video Surveillance | #7 of 85 in Feed Reader |
| GitHub stars | 4 721 ✓ | 4 080 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +36 ✓ | +28 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 ✓ | 4 |
| Latest release | 0.44.0 · 21 Jun 2026 | v2.9 · 7 Sept 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

motionEye scores 65/100 against 61/100 for Yarr, so it is the safer default.

motionEye ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for Yarr.

## Details

- [motionEye](https://selfhost.directory/project/motioneye) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/motioneye.md)
- [Yarr](https://selfhost.directory/project/yarr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/yarr.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/motioneye-vs-yarr