# motionEye vs εxodus

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | motionEye | εxodus |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 ✓ | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 24 in Video Surveillance | #5 of 12 in Privacy |
| GitHub stars | 4 721 ✓ | 813 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +36 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 ✓ | 5 |
| Latest release | 0.44.0 · 21 Jun 2026 | v1.33.0 · 13 Sept 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

motionEye scores 65/100 against 56/100 for εxodus, so it is the safer default.

motionEye ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for εxodus.

If you want the quickest setup, motionEye is easier to run; εxodus needs more configuration.

motionEye is growing faster right now (+36 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [motionEye](https://selfhost.directory/project/motioneye) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/motioneye.md)
- [εxodus](https://selfhost.directory/project/xodus) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/xodus.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/motioneye-vs-xodus