# motionEye vs Web Rendering Proxy (WRP)

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | motionEye | Web Rendering Proxy (WRP) |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 ✓ | 53/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 24 in Video Surveillance | #11 of 25 in Proxy |
| GitHub stars | 4 720 ✓ | 1 306 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +35 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 ✓ | 4 |
| Latest release | 0.44.0 · 21 Jun 2026 ✓ | 4.10.3 · 23 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

motionEye scores 65/100 against 53/100 for Web Rendering Proxy (WRP), so it is the safer default.

motionEye ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for Web Rendering Proxy (WRP).

motionEye is growing faster right now (+35 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [motionEye](https://selfhost.directory/project/motioneye) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/motioneye.md)
- [Web Rendering Proxy (WRP)](https://selfhost.directory/project/wrp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wrp.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/motioneye-vs-wrp