# motionEye vs wraft

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | motionEye | wraft |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 ✓ | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 24 in Video Surveillance | #35 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 4 721 ✓ | 167 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +36 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 ✓ | 3 |
| Latest release | 0.44.0 · 21 Jun 2026 | v0.6.7 · 25 Sept 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Elixir |

## Which one should you pick?

motionEye scores 65/100 against 44/100 for wraft, so it is the safer default.

motionEye ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for wraft.

If you want the quickest setup, motionEye is easier to run; wraft needs more configuration.

motionEye is growing faster right now (+36 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [motionEye](https://selfhost.directory/project/motioneye) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/motioneye.md)
- [wraft](https://selfhost.directory/project/wraft) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wraft.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/motioneye-vs-wraft