# motionEye vs Workout.cool

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | motionEye | Workout.cool |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 66/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 24 in Video Surveillance | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 4 720 | 8 650 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +36 | +155 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | 0.44.0 · 21 Jun 2026 ✓ | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Workout.cool scores 66/100 against 65/100 for motionEye, so it is the safer default.

motionEye ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Workout.cool.

Workout.cool is growing faster right now (+155 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [motionEye](https://selfhost.directory/project/motioneye) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/motioneye.md)
- [Workout.cool](https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/motioneye-vs-workout-cool