# motionEye vs voice-chat-ai

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | motionEye | voice-chat-ai |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 ✓ | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 24 in Video Surveillance | #41 of 69 in AI Chat |
| GitHub stars | 4 720 ✓ | 468 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +35 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 6 |
| Latest release | 0.44.0 · 21 Jun 2026 | v1.4.1 · 25 Sept 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

motionEye scores 65/100 against 46/100 for voice-chat-ai, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, motionEye is easier to run; voice-chat-ai needs more configuration.

motionEye is growing faster right now (+35 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [motionEye](https://selfhost.directory/project/motioneye) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/motioneye.md)
- [voice-chat-ai](https://selfhost.directory/project/voice-chat-ai) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/voice-chat-ai.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/motioneye-vs-voice-chat-ai