# motionEye vs url-to-png

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | motionEye | url-to-png |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 ✓ | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 24 in Video Surveillance | #13 of 16 in Web Scraping |
| GitHub stars | 4 720 ✓ | 256 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +35 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | 0.44.0 · 21 Jun 2026 ✓ | v2.1.4 · 18 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

motionEye scores 65/100 against 49/100 for url-to-png, so it is the safer default.

motionEye ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for url-to-png.

motionEye is growing faster right now (+35 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [motionEye](https://selfhost.directory/project/motioneye) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/motioneye.md)
- [url-to-png](https://selfhost.directory/project/url-to-png) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/url-to-png.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/motioneye-vs-url-to-png