# motionEye vs Uptime-Kuma-Web-API

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | motionEye | Uptime-Kuma-Web-API |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 ✓ | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 24 in Video Surveillance | #12 of 13 in API |
| GitHub stars | 4 721 ✓ | 282 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +36 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | 0.44.0 · 21 Jun 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | — |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

motionEye scores 65/100 against 39/100 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, so it is the safer default.

motionEye ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API.

If you want the quickest setup, motionEye is easier to run; Uptime-Kuma-Web-API needs more configuration.

motionEye is growing faster right now (+36 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [motionEye](https://selfhost.directory/project/motioneye) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/motioneye.md)
- [Uptime-Kuma-Web-API](https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma-web-api) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma-web-api.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/motioneye-vs-uptime-kuma-web-api