# motionEye vs Tryton

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | motionEye | Tryton |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 68/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 24 in Video Surveillance | #3 of 14 in ERP |
| GitHub stars | 4 720 ✓ | — |
| Stars, last 30 days | +36 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | 0.44.0 · 21 Jun 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | — |

## Which one should you pick?

Tryton scores 68/100 against 65/100 for motionEye, so it is the safer default.

motionEye ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Tryton.

If you want the quickest setup, motionEye is easier to run; Tryton needs more configuration.

motionEye is growing faster right now (+36 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [motionEye](https://selfhost.directory/project/motioneye) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/motioneye.md)
- [Tryton](https://selfhost.directory/project/tryton) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tryton.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/motioneye-vs-tryton