# motionEye vs TradingAgents

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | motionEye | TradingAgents |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 24 in Video Surveillance | #3 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 4 720 | 117 816 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +36 | +5 457 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | 0.44.0 · 21 Jun 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 65/100 for motionEye, so it is the safer default.

TradingAgents ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for motionEye.

If you want the quickest setup, motionEye is easier to run; TradingAgents needs more configuration.

TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 457 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [motionEye](https://selfhost.directory/project/motioneye) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/motioneye.md)
- [TradingAgents](https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/motioneye-vs-tradingagents