# motionEye vs SSH & Web Terminal

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | motionEye | SSH & Web Terminal |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 ✓ | 60/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 24 in Video Surveillance | #30 of 104 in Home Automation |
| GitHub stars | 4 720 ✓ | 542 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +36 ✓ | +7 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 19 ✓ |
| Latest release | 0.44.0 · 21 Jun 2026 | v24.2.0 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

motionEye scores 65/100 against 60/100 for SSH & Web Terminal, so it is the safer default.

SSH & Web Terminal ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for motionEye.

If you want the quickest setup, motionEye is easier to run; SSH & Web Terminal needs more configuration.

motionEye is growing faster right now (+36 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [motionEye](https://selfhost.directory/project/motioneye) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/motioneye.md)
- [SSH & Web Terminal](https://selfhost.directory/project/ssh-web-terminal) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ssh-web-terminal.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/motioneye-vs-ssh-web-terminal