# motionEye vs SafeLine

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | motionEye | SafeLine |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 81/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 24 in Video Surveillance | #1 of 3 in Web Application Firewall |
| GitHub stars | 4 720 | 23 066 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +36 | +396 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | 0.44.0 · 21 Jun 2026 | v9.4.3 · 21 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

SafeLine scores 81/100 against 65/100 for motionEye, so it is the safer default.

SafeLine ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for motionEye.

If you want the quickest setup, motionEye is easier to run; SafeLine needs more configuration.

SafeLine is growing faster right now (+396 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [motionEye](https://selfhost.directory/project/motioneye) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/motioneye.md)
- [SafeLine](https://selfhost.directory/project/safeline) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/safeline.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/motioneye-vs-safeline