# motionEye vs rudderstack

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | motionEye | rudderstack |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 ✓ | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 24 in Video Surveillance | #1 of 3 in Customer Data Platform |
| GitHub stars | 4 721 ✓ | 4 508 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +36 ✓ | +20 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 39 ✓ |
| Latest release | 0.44.0 · 21 Jun 2026 | v1.92.1 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

motionEye scores 65/100 against 64/100 for rudderstack, so it is the safer default.

rudderstack ships more often: 39 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for motionEye.

If you want the quickest setup, motionEye is easier to run; rudderstack needs more configuration.

## Details

- [motionEye](https://selfhost.directory/project/motioneye) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/motioneye.md)
- [rudderstack](https://selfhost.directory/project/rudderstack) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rudderstack.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/motioneye-vs-rudderstack