# motionEye vs RemoteTerm for MeshCore

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | motionEye | RemoteTerm for MeshCore |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 ✓ | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 24 in Video Surveillance | #4 of 4 in Amateur Radio |
| GitHub stars | 4 721 ✓ | 338 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +36 ✓ | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | 0.44.0 · 21 Jun 2026 | 3.17.1 · 26 Jul 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

motionEye scores 65/100 against 45/100 for RemoteTerm for MeshCore, so it is the safer default.

RemoteTerm for MeshCore ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for motionEye.

If you want the quickest setup, motionEye is easier to run; RemoteTerm for MeshCore needs more configuration.

motionEye is growing faster right now (+36 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [motionEye](https://selfhost.directory/project/motioneye) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/motioneye.md)
- [RemoteTerm for MeshCore](https://selfhost.directory/project/remote-terminal-for-meshcore) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/remote-terminal-for-meshcore.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/motioneye-vs-remote-terminal-for-meshcore