# motionEye vs Pulse

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | motionEye | Pulse |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 71/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 24 in Video Surveillance | #2 of 19 in Infrastructure Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 4 720 | 6 970 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +36 | +229 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 43 ✓ |
| Latest release | 0.44.0 · 21 Jun 2026 | helm-chart-6.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Pulse scores 71/100 against 65/100 for motionEye, so it is the safer default.

Pulse ships more often: 43 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for motionEye.

Pulse is growing faster right now (+229 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [motionEye](https://selfhost.directory/project/motioneye) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/motioneye.md)
- [Pulse](https://selfhost.directory/project/pulse) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pulse.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/motioneye-vs-pulse