# motionEye vs Proxmox Kubernetes Engine

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | motionEye | Proxmox Kubernetes Engine |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 ✓ | 41/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 24 in Video Surveillance | #10 of 11 in Container Orchestration |
| GitHub stars | 4 721 ✓ | 244 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +36 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 7 ✓ |
| Latest release | 0.44.0 · 21 Jun 2026 | v0.0.7 · 13 Sept 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | — |

## Which one should you pick?

motionEye scores 65/100 against 41/100 for Proxmox Kubernetes Engine, so it is the safer default.

Proxmox Kubernetes Engine ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for motionEye.

If you want the quickest setup, motionEye is easier to run; Proxmox Kubernetes Engine needs more configuration.

motionEye is growing faster right now (+36 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [motionEye](https://selfhost.directory/project/motioneye) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/motioneye.md)
- [Proxmox Kubernetes Engine](https://selfhost.directory/project/proxmox-kubernetes-engine) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/proxmox-kubernetes-engine.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/motioneye-vs-proxmox-kubernetes-engine