# motionEye vs penpot

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | motionEye | penpot |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 84/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 24 in Video Surveillance | #1 of 30 in Collaboration |
| GitHub stars | 4 721 | 61 824 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +36 | +1 482 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 12 ✓ |
| Latest release | 0.44.0 · 21 Jun 2026 | 2.18.5 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Clojure |

## Which one should you pick?

penpot scores 84/100 against 65/100 for motionEye, so it is the safer default.

penpot ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for motionEye.

If you want the quickest setup, motionEye is easier to run; penpot needs more configuration.

penpot is growing faster right now (+1 482 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [motionEye](https://selfhost.directory/project/motioneye) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/motioneye.md)
- [penpot](https://selfhost.directory/project/penpot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/penpot.md)

## Related comparisons

- [OpenDesign vs penpot](https://selfhost.directory/compare/open-design-vs-penpot)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/motioneye-vs-penpot