# motionEye vs openDCIM

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | motionEye | openDCIM |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 ✓ | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 24 in Video Surveillance | #13 of 19 in Infrastructure Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 4 721 ✓ | 369 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +36 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | 0.44.0 · 21 Jun 2026 | 26.01 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0-only |
| Main language | Python | PHP |

## Which one should you pick?

motionEye scores 65/100 against 48/100 for openDCIM, so it is the safer default.

motionEye ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for openDCIM.

If you want the quickest setup, motionEye is easier to run; openDCIM needs more configuration.

motionEye is growing faster right now (+36 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [motionEye](https://selfhost.directory/project/motioneye) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/motioneye.md)
- [openDCIM](https://selfhost.directory/project/opendcim) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/opendcim.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/motioneye-vs-opendcim