# motionEye vs Octoprint

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | motionEye | Octoprint |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 73/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 24 in Video Surveillance | #1 of 22 in 3D Printing |
| GitHub stars | 4 720 | 9 167 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +36 | +59 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 ✓ | 5 |
| Latest release | 0.44.0 · 21 Jun 2026 | 1.11.8 · 23 Jun 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Octoprint scores 73/100 against 65/100 for motionEye, so it is the safer default.

motionEye ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Octoprint.

If you want the quickest setup, motionEye is easier to run; Octoprint needs more configuration.

## Details

- [motionEye](https://selfhost.directory/project/motioneye) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/motioneye.md)
- [Octoprint](https://selfhost.directory/project/octoprint) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/octoprint.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/motioneye-vs-octoprint