# motionEye vs NetworkOptimizer

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | motionEye | NetworkOptimizer |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 ✓ | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 24 in Video Surveillance | #17 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 4 720 ✓ | 1 213 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +35 ✓ | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 23 ✓ |
| Latest release | 0.44.0 · 21 Jun 2026 | v2.10.3 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Python | C# |

## Which one should you pick?

motionEye scores 65/100 against 56/100 for NetworkOptimizer, so it is the safer default.

NetworkOptimizer ships more often: 23 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for motionEye.

If you want the quickest setup, motionEye is easier to run; NetworkOptimizer needs more configuration.

motionEye is growing faster right now (+35 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [motionEye](https://selfhost.directory/project/motioneye) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/motioneye.md)
- [NetworkOptimizer](https://selfhost.directory/project/networkoptimizer) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/networkoptimizer.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/motioneye-vs-networkoptimizer