# motionEye vs Neko

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | motionEye | Neko |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 78/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 24 in Video Surveillance | #3 of 22 in Remote Desktop |
| GitHub stars | 4 720 | 22 563 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +36 | +188 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 ✓ | 4 |
| Latest release | 0.44.0 · 21 Jun 2026 | v3.2.0 · 15 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Neko scores 78/100 against 65/100 for motionEye, so it is the safer default.

motionEye ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for Neko.

If you want the quickest setup, motionEye is easier to run; Neko needs more configuration.

Neko is growing faster right now (+188 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [motionEye](https://selfhost.directory/project/motioneye) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/motioneye.md)
- [Neko](https://selfhost.directory/project/neko) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/neko.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/motioneye-vs-neko