# motionEye vs Nakama

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | motionEye | Nakama |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 76/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 24 in Video Surveillance | #3 of 62 in Game Servers |
| GitHub stars | 4 720 | 13 604 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +36 | +62 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 9 ✓ |
| Latest release | 0.44.0 · 21 Jun 2026 | v3.41.0 · 18 Sept 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Nakama scores 76/100 against 65/100 for motionEye, so it is the safer default.

Nakama ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for motionEye.

If you want the quickest setup, motionEye is easier to run; Nakama needs more configuration.

## Details

- [motionEye](https://selfhost.directory/project/motioneye) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/motioneye.md)
- [Nakama](https://selfhost.directory/project/nakama) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nakama.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/motioneye-vs-nakama