# Moodle vs uptime-kuma

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Moodle | uptime-kuma |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 88/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 14 in Learning Management System | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | — | 93 050 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +1 256 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 19 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | — | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 71/100 for Moodle, so it is the safer default.

uptime-kuma ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Moodle.

If you want the quickest setup, uptime-kuma is easier to run; Moodle needs more configuration.

uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 256 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Moodle](https://selfhost.directory/project/moodle) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/moodle.md)
- [uptime-kuma](https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/moodle-vs-uptime-kuma