# monocker vs supabase

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | monocker | supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 92/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #70 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #1 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 199 | 114 258 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +3 549 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 8 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

supabase scores 92/100 against 47/100 for monocker, so it is the safer default.

supabase ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for monocker.

If you want the quickest setup, monocker is easier to run; supabase needs more configuration.

supabase is growing faster right now (+3 549 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [monocker](https://selfhost.directory/project/monocker) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/monocker.md)
- [supabase](https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Appwrite vs supabase](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-supabase)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/monocker-vs-supabase