# monocker vs Nezha

> Two self-hosted [Monitoring & observability projects](https://selfhost.directory/monitoring-observability), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | monocker | Nezha |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 72/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #70 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #15 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 199 | 10 377 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +45 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 40 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v2.6.0 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | WTFPL |
| Main language | JavaScript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Nezha scores 72/100 against 47/100 for monocker, so it is the safer default.

Nezha ships more often: 40 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for monocker.

If you want the quickest setup, monocker is easier to run; Nezha needs more configuration.

Nezha is growing faster right now (+45 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [monocker](https://selfhost.directory/project/monocker) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/monocker.md)
- [Nezha](https://selfhost.directory/project/nezha) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nezha.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/monocker-vs-nezha